Jet, they always were. It's a standard practice for them. "Let me fight for you, you poor silenced minority!" is a sentiment that echoes in their collective consciousness, and some sort of heroic complex that plagues them.
To Kill a Mockingbird is an incredibly important work of literature that is referenced very often, and offers historical insight that can't be obtained anywhere else. And those idiots think they're doing their children a favor by not letting them read it...
That's dumb. Can people realise standards have changed and yes, people were not that careful about what they said?
In comparison, in UK government have removed all non-British books from Literature GCSE (secondary school qualification), and that's not whingey numbnuts but a numbnut education secretary.
I hope to God they re-ban The Catcher in the Rye because lord knows I can only hand so many paragraphs about a white teenager constantly complaining about his life.
The key difference would be who you'd be racist towards if you were a white supremacist or KKK member. But then again, words such as racist and sexist lost their meanings so greatly you can't use 'em without a pinch of salt.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.