Well, it’d be boring if anyone has. Or maybe pretentious.
I heard the view somewhere before that people are enigmas. And I, rationally inclined, am inclined to agree.
Yet enigmas are puzzles, and all puzzles have solutions. Ergo, deducing the clockwork of the human psyche, the mind and its interactions with emotions, must be the greatest puzzle to exist.
For me it's more like trying to assemble a jigsaw puzzle. Many of the pieces often have inconsistent shapes, and just as many are invisible, leaving me to guess when I can't find a way to see them, or can't spot them.
And who knows, it doesn't have to be a puzzle with one plain solution. What if it's only solved when you learn to navigate it?
It's not really a test of tech, but rather whether one can ever hit the nail on the head with the correct path of thinking.
A whole lot more horizons are currently open in that respect, I believe. The thing is that there's a whole lot of things that can be adjusted. And the execution's difficult to nail even if the theory's right...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.