neoselket
Ice Queen
my responses are in blue.
sorry for the long response, i wanted to reply to each argument in question.
Because by the time of LotR, there weren't many Balrogs left. The debate of this thread isn't time specific, so I'm assuming basic meta-battle rules where each side gets the units from the height of their power.
in that case, voldemort gets a basilisk, a giant(venomous) snake that causes instant death to anything that looks into it's eyes. that'll take down a few thousand orcs in the first few seconds. could probably at least cause some minor discomfort in the nazgul, after all the basilisk was even capable of petrifying ghosts. none of sauron's minions seem to have any power over them if the battle of pelennor fields is any indication.
It does bend minds to the will of Sauron and Sauron's will is basically to destroy the age of man and to rule the world as its dark master. Even if you defeated the shadow of Sauron, you would take his place becoming the new Sauron. The new ruler may think they are in control, but they aren't, through the Ring they are following the will of Sauron. It is why Frodo was repeatedly tempted to put the ring on in dangerous situations, even knowing it was a bad idea, because the Ring was influencing him so as to get itself returned to Sauron, because that was Sauron's will.
then why was sauron afraid of someone like Aragorn getting the ring?
Aragorn wasn't descended from "a bunch of really powerful guys", he is descended from a very powerful race of people, the Numenoreans, pretty much a race of Captain Americas with Elf blood and magical aptitude thrown in. It is like saying you could win a boxing match because your father and his father and his father's father were great boxers, but your opponent is a Mountain Giant. One has an impressive family history, the other is from an entire race who's basic physical characteristics outclass the former.
so you're saying that your ancestors don't matter? that just makes Aragorn a normal guy with a special sword. and if they do matter, voldemort has powerful ancestors too, but he also has magic, which Aragorn didn't. that makes Aragorn weaker than voldemort.
They weren't normal swords, they were ancient swords crafted by the Numenorean descended race, the Westernesse, who were a step below their Numenorean ancestors but still one or two steps above normal humans. Their swords were all inherently the equivalent of magical artifacts. Once again, I point to the standard fantasy rule of things crafted in the past being inherently more powerful than things crafted in the present.
while that may be true most of the time, it isn't always. and if it is, voldemort has the sword of Godric Gryffindor, which would be as powerful as narsil by that logic.
D&D is a decades old system designed entirely to qualify and quantify fantasy mechanics. I used it to qualify the relative power levels between the two sides. Those points were entirely valid and relevant.
you're still assuming which levels each would hold, and having a higher "magic level" doesn't necessarily mean something is more powerful. a mortal would have no chance of standing against voldemort unless they had a gun/bomb or some other extremely destructive weapon and managed to get a surprise attack(not easy.) sauron was defeated by mortals.
at close range.
with swords.
voldemort could have killed isildur in one second without even barely thinking about it. sauron was fighting as hard as he could(or was the worst military strategist ever) and still lost.
No, it is more like comparing a Balrog vs a hobbit and the hobbit would always lose, because one is an unmortal creature that can only be destroyed by a creature of equal or greater power, such as the deity Gandalf (remember, Gandalf isn't a wizard, Wizard is a title, he is a Maia just like Sauron) and the other is a mortal creature with no hope of winning. I haven't given an insta-win based on titles, I've clearly laid out why the question posits an inherently unbalanced battle between one side that is entirely outclassed by the other.
except that the 'balrog' in this situation(sauron) was defeated(albeit temporarily) by a 'hobbit'(isildur) with no magical abilities whatsoever. meanwhile, the only reason voldemort lost was because of the powerful protective charm harry's mother gave him plus the fact he was accidentally fighting with harry's wand, which refused to kill it's master. last i checked, voldemort is a lot more powerful than isildur.
Let's see if putting it this way will highlight the imbalance:
Isildur and the combined armies of the ancient races barely managed to defeat Sauron and capture the Ring. Frodo and the Fellowship with the help of Gandalf and two wars including the combined modern races barely managed to destroy the Ring. However, Sauron is still not dead and will never be dead because he is a deity and only the creator deity has the power to unmake him. Short of the creator unmaking him or the other deities staging another deity war to lock him away as the did Morgoth, he will always return at some point no matter how many times the mortal world may defeat him.
Voldemort was killed and is dead. Every wiki I've check confirms this, after the last phylactery is destroyed, he became mortal again and was killed.
voldemort: no longer in the mortal realm, no power, will never return.
sauron: no longer in the mortal realm, no power. may return sometime in a few centuries or so.
not seeing much of a difference here.
Do you see the difference? One side is lead by an eternal, unkillable being with powers on the cosmic scale. The other side is led by an admittedly powerful mortal wizard who can die. Voldemort most certainly could win some battles in this hypothetical war, but he could never, ever win the war because Sauron can not be permanently killed.
maybe sauron didn't technically 'die', but he was defeated, made powerless, and with no interaction with the living world. that's basically the same thing.
Just hearing the name of Ringwraiths was enough to scare most people in Middle-earth. The reason why the Nazgul were defeated at Weathertop was because they acted too slowly + they are scared of fire, and fire did Aragorn wield.
last i checked, voldemort has access to roughly literally infinite fire that is occasionally sentient and will chase down it's prey. Aragorn had one torch.
As for Elendil and Gil-galad, one descended from Elrond's brother Elros Tar-Minyatur and the other from Fingolfin who himself was the younger son of Finwe, the First High King of the Noldor. Both were quite tall, especially Elendil. Both could use Palantiri, and in fact Gil-galad had fought Sauron twice before. Why, he had the power of one of the Three Rings of the Elves (others being with Galadriel and Elrond) and according to what I know, the Three gave their bearers magical powers, not to mention Gil-galad's lineage!
weren't those rings made by sauron himself to be controlled by the one ring? as for lineage, voldemort is the heir of slytherin.
Now you are saying Dementors aren't undead but see...
"Dementors hold no true loyalty, except to whomever can provide them with the most people to feed off."
And Sauron can easily arrange for that - surely the Dementors will betray Voldy! Also you say that mortals ended the Witch-king. Well, both ALMOST died due to the Witch-king's Black Breath. Moreover, Merry's sword was shattered instantaneously when it hit the Witch-king, which distracted him, giving Eowyn a chance to stab him. It was only because Aragorn brewed Kingsfoil in the Houses of Healing that they survived. Same with Frodo after the Weathertop incident. The wound from the Morgul blade hurt Frodo forever after that. Also Aragorn was an excellent swordsman. And the Nazgul saw Frodo after he put on the Ring, in the Wraith-world.
voldemort is giving the dementors a few thousand orcs to feed off plus anyon who gets in his way. sauron needs his orcs. as for the ringwraiths, the witch-king was killed, again, by a MORTAL woman and a MORTAL hobbit. neither had any magical powers at all, just swords. voldemort and the death eaters have a plethora of spells, potions, and magical items to help them. the nazgul seem pretty squishy to me, TBH.
Does hearing the name of dementors cause fear? Is a person attacked by dementors haunted with the memories ever after?
yes. the third harry potter book goes into that in detail. also, dementors can suck out your soul and can never be truly killed, just driven away(although if the conditions in which they breed, i.e fear and despair are made rarer, their numbers can be limited). don't think nazgul can do that.
Can 1 DE take on 1000 orcs, 10 trolls and 1000 mannish allies of Sauron at one time??? I need answers, as they are decisive.
yes. in almost all of my other posts, i mentioned how the death eaters would be essentially immune to orcs. 80% of orcs' arsenal consists of swords, spears, and other melee weapons. death eaters can fly, thereby rendering all the orcs' weaponry useless. archers? death eaters have shield charms that can block arrows and tons of other attacks. trolls? sure. set them on fire, magically bleed them to death, take control of their mind and cause them to start killing orcs, the possibilities are endless of all the ways the death eaters could defeat sauron's minions. oliphaunts? blind them, take control of their minds, and make them start attacking their own allies. bring a basilisk in and kill all orcs with a clear view in about 10 seconds. nazgul? kill their fell beasts and let them plummet to the ground. nazgul don't have ranged attacks, do they? voldemort and his army have a myriad of weapons, sauron and co. mostly use swords, which are easily defended against.
Voldemort's Death Eaters are few in number and even fewer legitimately serve him. The rest do so out of fear. There is no doubt a number of them would defect to Sauron's side.
they aren't as few as you think. the ones in the books were just the inner circle, he has a ton of others you don't see. that's why the battle of Hogwarts involved more than 30 participants from each side. plus, if any defected, they would either die instantly or be imperiused and forced to fight.
Dementors would also turn away from Voldy's control and could quite possibly turn on his own Death Eaters, as they have more positive emotions/memories than the purely negative Orcs. Post-battle, the Dementors would likely drift towards the Shire.
except that the death eaters can apparate(teleport) away easily and some can even cast patronuses, while orcs are utterly defenseless. I'd be surprised if the orcs could even fight after seeing all the dementors.
As for the few remaining Death Eaters, they would be boned simply because of the presence of the Nazgûl. Their screams render even the most courageous warrior terrified beyond comprehension. Rightfully so, as they're the invisible threat of impending death. The Witch-king in particular cannot be slain by men. That's a pretty good resistance in this engagement. The screams alone would be so distracting that the Death Eaters wouldn't be able to concentrate on the simplest of spells. Similarly, Apparition is out of the question. The Orcs would efficiently kill the lot of them - Voldemort included.
dementors are worse, and only fightable with magic, which, oh yeah, orcs can't do. they can do a lot worse than kill you, and if the witch-king is so tough, how come he was killed by a non-magical hobbit and a similarly magic-challenge woman using only swords? and if the screams are so bad, wouldn't that mean all the warriors in LOTR would have been unable to fight, too? they seemed to put up a pretty good resistance with no magical abilities.
Sauron wouldn't even need to get personally involved.
sorry for the long response, i wanted to reply to each argument in question.