Was this Whip specifically designed to be good against the Wall of Flesh? Because it's definitely good at that, the low falloff helps a ton against the Hungries and makes for an overall safe WoF fight. Also a nice tag damage buff that Blade Staff especially likes. Very good weapon.
I took the Hungries into consideration specifically when designing it, as well as early Hardmode "enemy swarms".
Originally, I had considered a different mechanic where it did increased damage after you took damage, but this ended up sounding just exploitable but also not fun, so I went with the low Shadowbeam Protocol instead.
it's not going to be a 50% nerf because... iFrames. 1 frog can attack so fast that even going to 2 vampire frogs yields very little benefit.
This just sounds . . . like an incorrect philosophy of analyzing minions to me.
Right now, Vampire Frog has a 10 frame hit timer. So it can literally hit 6 times per second, ASSUMING it is actively in contact for the entire time. At face value, changing this to 20 frames is literally a direct nerf of 50% DPS for a single frog.
But in contrast to 1.4? Now, originally, it could only hit during the animation phase, but the frame time was still low, so "5 vampire frogs" could still hit up to 6 times per second, they just wouldn't individually hit more than 3x per second.
If I change the frame count to 20, then there is a hard cap of 3 hits per second from ANY vampire frogs, which would be less than 1.4's system, where you could hit more than 3 times per second (even if the hits were less common and did 2-less damage).
I also think this is really an inaccurate way to perceive minions given that A) having more minions can mean they are attacking different targets at once B) more minions means more active coverage of the field, less downtime. Not being a nerf only would be true if there was only ever a single frog on a single target 100% of the time, which they aren't likely to be doing because they are constantly moving in and out of effective range.
And to reiterate, this is much in contrast to a lot of other feedback in the thread advocating for only a minor nerf. So this does not sound like the proper course of action to me.