Is it considered a rip off to add something another game adds, if so, all games featuring spaceships would be rip-offs of Galaxy Invaders. As far as i know, it can't be a rip off of something if it is something like an animal or something commonly known, that is like saying putting a zebra in a video game would make it a rip off of Zoo Tycoon.So, we should blatantly rip off other games to boost mobile sales? No thanks.
You are saying that since they have those in their game, Terraria has to have them or else it won't attract a minority that won't even get it until 1.3, since stuff gets added to PC first.Is it considered a rip off to add something another game adds, if so, all games featuring spaceships would be rip-offs of Galaxy Invaders. As far as i know, it can't be a rip off of something if it is something like an animal or something commonly known, that is like saying putting a zebra in a video game would make it a rip off of Zoo Tycoon.
I am not saying it has to be put in, just that it would be fun to have these thing, that is why it is in the suggestions, it is a suggestion.
Really? Because that looks like you saying that if the other 2 have it, it needs to be done no matter what.As many of you know Terraria is a block game. While there are many block games, the top three, at least on mobile, are MInecraft, Survivalcraft, and in 3rd place Terraria. I don't see how Terraria came in third place, but it did. What if it came in 1st? It would have to beat Survivalcraft in animals, Minecraft in, well whatever is so special about Minecraft.
* Is in Survivalcraft- minor priority that can wait
** Is in Minecraft- average priority that needs to be done
*** Is in Survivalcraft and Minecraft NEEDS TO BE DONE
**** Is not in either and will push ahead Terraria
~ New
# Edited
Actually, horses were from a mod which was rather popular since the beta. In fact, the person who made that mod even worked on adding horses to vanilla, and coal blocks were suggested since a long time. Do your research.Actually minecraft took a few things from survivalcraft example: solid coal blocks and horses
When i wrote that i meant that it would make the game better, not that it had to be doneReally? Because that looks like you saying that if the other 2 have it, it needs to be done no matter what.
But that is in a mod and suggestion, Survivalcraft still would have it first in the actual gameActually, horses were from a mod which was rather popular since the beta. In fact, the person who made that mod even worked on adding horses to vanilla, and coal blocks were suggested since a long time. Do your research.
As opposed to the dozen or so mods that existed since the beta?Actually minecraft took a few things from survivalcraft example: solid coal blocks and horses
That doesn´t mean it was taken from there.But that is in a mod and suggestion, Survivalcraft still would have it first in the actual game
Um... horses were from the Mo' Creatures mod, made by Dr. Zhark. As in I'm pretty sure the code was taken directly from that (with permission). Minus the pegasi.Actually minecraft took a few things from survivalcraft example: solid coal blocks and horses
Minus the pegasi.
Oh that feeling when you get grilled by a person that is in 2nd place for the most likes. It's ing annoying.Yes:
I am not against reviving old threads - I'm against thread necromancy, which is basically what you did - revive a thread for no good reason (and no, calling someone out is not a good reason, it's so far away from a good reason, it's in Narnia.) There's no rules against reviving old threads, but last time I checked, there were rules against pointlessness and "wanna fite?" posts.
He had a very good point though... (and I don't see how "2nd place for the most likes" has to do with anything.)Oh that feeling when you get grilled by a person that is in 2nd place for the most likes. It's ing annoying.
Oh that feeling when you get grilled by a person that is in 2nd place for the most likes. It's ing annoying.