People should learn about the reason why "Claim and Evidence" has the word AND in it.
SERIOUSLY.
I can't
ing understand crap if you put evidence in front of me and expect me to know the
ing claim.
Imagine this, we are in a police station and we are working there for investigation stuff, and a colleague comes up and puts a napkin on my table in an evidence bag. WTF am I supposed to do with that? WTF does it relate to? The colleague just stares at me as if I'm supposed to
ing know. But I
ing don't. They provide me with evidence, but they don't provide the claim. They don't say
about the napkin and how it's soaked in formawhatever and is used in a crime of whatever, no they just give me evidence, and don't
ing give claim.
Then they blame you for not
ing getting it! It's so
ing enraging, they are not giving the
ing information I need, and yet they blame me for the fact that they didn't give enough
ing information! CLAIM AND EVIDENCE, there's a reason why there's an '"and" in that. Make a
ing thesis statement or something, don't just drop evidence on me and look at me like a
ing dog and expect me to get what you're trying to say!