what about this
e+at88920- 629g8ujhje8t*fuj2004tjjnweoiert/g88932jhjhjgooskejfo23489t9923uhtfgl+e8849921fjnnsiignerioujgbutts95230549'102313371337PINGAS
anyone?
ok i'll just throw some more
8189357891389450134789057901890234789051708934905692378978968991347893478568345885981739847671819678989478956089348957931467318945798845897674189489584179589234809578901356873891896913048573895673789056713967138906738968138986930478963896889576767798031057634067354684568768389589417905679314858745843910475588901783489579019084578+e901848904903010=
@MarioKart7z That's not a valid for-loop, you set i to 0 and check if it's greater than 97589273489057802909859029093+e99547220, which is far greater than the maximum capacity of an unsigned int, and the loop doesn't run ಠ_ಠ
They can, but you tend to get the typical floating point problems. As an example, incrementing by 0.1f each iteration will get you 7.79999 instead of 7.8 in some places.
I'm pretty sure the reason that happens is because of the amplification of the smallest value possible (denoted as Epsilon in both float and double in System.dll)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
(now algebraic simultaneous equations are ing scary)