Yeah, but it would be so useful, as it would free one accessory slot for using with combat accessories.That would be cool to see, but all of the equipment slots are made for accessories that couldn't even be equipped before recently. The reason they were created for the items they were is because the items were originally just taking up space in your inventory for no reason, so it wouldn't make much sense for one to be made for wings.
Well, I'm saying that the reason the other slots were added was for convenience, not to open up an accessory slot. I guess what I'm saying is I think it would be too OP.Yeah, but it would be so useful, as it would free one accessory slot for using with combat accessories.
I have do disagree. Once you get good at dodging stuff it's really just an item that's in the way of any damage doing item you could use instead.The biggest offender in the "always equipped" category is the Ankh Shield, though. I mean, practically everybody will use it once they get their hands on it because it's simply the most useful accessory out there.
I have do disagree. Once you get good at dodging stuff it's really just an item that's in the way of any damage doing item you could use instead.
There was a time where I'd equip it all the time on all my characters, but one day I thought to myself: Why am I even using it? Overrated item.
It's handy when used with true melee weapons though (melee weapons without projectiles), so you don't bounce out of range.
You're missing the point by a long shot. No need to rework anything there, mage, melee and summoner players are not using wings anymore. Rangers use wings, but they are much weaker than the other classes in multiple aspects.- Add this wing slot and with it free up an accessory slot, which would reduce the game balance Re-Logic intended. Sure, they could rework every single accessory in the game, but that'd take a ton of time and would not really be worth it.
Currently all other classes have better - and more damaging - weapon options than ranged
I'm still missing the point. Adding a wing slot would give rangers an extra accessory slot is what you're saying, right? But it would do the same for the other classes.You're missing the point by a long shot. No need to rework anything there, mage, melee and summoner players are not using wings anymore. Rangers use wings, but they are much weaker than the other classes in multiple aspects.
Mages, warriors and summoners can all use one more accessory than rangers.
This change would only affect the weakest class in the current game and it would be a positive change that puts it more in line. Adding a wing slot to the character actually helps the balance of the game, it's a fix to a problem that exists.
Different strokes for different folks, I suppose.
You say it would give an additional slot to a mage, a warrior or a summoner. None of them wears wings anymore.I'm still missing the point. Adding a wing slot would give rangers an extra accessory slot is what you're saying, right? But it would do the same for the other classes.
I also don't get why you'd call the ranger weak. With the right setup it kicks serious behind and with the huge assortment of bullet and arrow types you can go into any direction.
Aaand I also don't get why magic/melee/summon wouldn't use wings. Wings are awesome. But like Tyrian3k said:
We also had a topic for that with dozens of pages math and everything. Devs didn't care. Vortex is bad and it was designed with the sole purpose to be bad.Melee deals more damage than ranged? Did I miss something?
In any case: They might as well give rangers a set bonus they can actually use properly instead of giving us a wing slot to fix a ranger-specific issue.
Rangers are the only class whose set bonuses are highly impractical to use in most fights, especially in single player, where you need to be able to dodge essentially all the time. With Shroomite, you lose the bonus if you move or get hit and I really can't think of any significant fight where you can stand still *and* not get hit.
Vortex isn't quite as bad, but your movement is essentially locked to up and down for the time it's active, which makes this bonus mostly unusable as well.
Maybe you don't use wings anymore, that's fine. I do and many others do as well, I'm sure.You say it would give an additional slot to a mage, a warrior or a summoner. None of them wears wings anymore.
If you give them a wing slot, it doesn't give them anything.
Your average mage wears that. I'm sure others do as well. I'm also sure a lot of us do not. I love my wings and find them a lot more practical than any mount, including the CCK. Different play style and all that.The avarage Mage wears a Celestial Emblem, a Mage Emblem, a Destroyer Emblem, a Celestial Shell and a Celestial Stone. All damage accessories for fights. If you give it a wing slot, it won't gain anything from that for that every single mage uses a Cosmic Car Key or a Shrimpy Truffle.
Same goes for everyone, except the Ranger. The ranger can't use mounts while using Vortex armor. Mounts disable stealth.
Over 2k hours of game time, I'm very aware of what a CCK can do. "If you'll ever find a CCK..." It's all good, no offense, it just made me laugh.If you'll ever find a Cosmic Car Key or a Shrimpy Truffle, you'll learn why wings are obsolete, they just take up an accessory slot. Wings are useless currently, they offer nothing a good mount doesn't offer without taking up an accessory slot.
It doesn't matter, if you have one equipped it doesn't make wings a magical substance. By clear and objective thinking, having a wing equipped is still inferior, regardless of if you like or not. Fact.Maybe you don't use wings anymore, that's fine. I do and many others do as well, I'm sure.
Did you read anything? That's the point there, it's discriminating currently, only rangers are forced to use wings and they are already bleeding from countless wounds. Giving people a wing accessory slot would help balance by fixing this discriminative crap about Vortex to an extent.And as a final note: I do like the idea of wings in a separate slot, and am glad that T:O is apparently doing just this. I just think it'd screw up the balance Re-Logic intended in Terraria.
It wouldn't. At least not any more than we do now. How did we get here? We already have a damn wing slot! Except it is called a mount and that socket is discriminative. The Mount socket currently is a socket designed for the most powerful wings, but ranged players are discriminated and can't use that in combat. If a given ~10-20% of people are forced for their playstyle to use inferior forms of mobility, they shouldn't be handicapped further by descreasing their accessory slots too. It's just not right currently, this state is against balance.It also sets a dangerous precedent. If we have wings slot, then we'll want a boots slot. Or a shield slot. Or a gloves slot...
Please try to be a little less hostile about thisIt doesn't matter, if you have one equipped it doesn't make wings a magical substance. By clear and objective thinking, having a wing equipped is still inferior, regardless of if you like or not. Fact.
Did you read anything? That's the point there, it's discriminating currently, only rangers are forced to use wings and they are already bleeding from countless wounds. Giving people a wing accessory slot would help balance by fixing this discriminative crap about Vortex to an extent.
Practically everyone has a slot for the most powerful "wing", even if it called a mount, except rangers.
What kind of balance is that in your book?
It wouldn't. At least not any more than we do now. How did we get here? We already have a damn wing slot! Except it is called a mount and that socket is discriminative. The Mount socket currently is a socket designed for the most powerful wings, but ranged players are discriminated and can't use that in combat. If a given ~10-20% of people are forced for their playstyle to use inferior forms of mobility, they shouldn't be handicapped further by descreasing their accessory slots too. It's just not right currently, this state is against balance.
Inferior to a CCK? No, this is not a fact, this is your opinion. I'd like to argument against the rest as well, but like Ambitions I also don't see why you need to be so hostile.It doesn't matter, if you have one equipped it doesn't make wings a magical substance. By clear and objective thinking, having a wing equipped is still inferior, regardless of if you like or not. Fact.
It doesn't matter, if you have one equipped it doesn't make wings a magical substance. By clear and objective thinking, having a wing equipped is still inferior, regardless of if you like or not. Fact.
Did you read anything? That's the point there, it's discriminating currently, only rangers are forced to use wings and they are already bleeding from countless wounds. Giving people a wing accessory slot would help balance by fixing this discriminative crap about Vortex to an extent.
Practically everyone has a slot for the most powerful "wing", even if it called a mount, except rangers.
What kind of balance is that in your book?
It wouldn't. At least not any more than we do now. How did we get here? We already have a damn wing slot! Except it is called a mount and that socket is discriminative. The Mount socket currently is a socket designed for the most powerful wings, but ranged players are discriminated and can't use that in combat. If a given ~10-20% of people are forced for their playstyle to use inferior forms of mobility, they shouldn't be handicapped further by descreasing their accessory slots too. It's just not right currently, this state is against balance.
I still regard that as a step forward.The ranger's problems have nothing to do with a lack of a wing slot, but with the set bonuses of Shroomite and Vortex Armor... that is a topic that should stay in its own thread, though.
In regard of my behaviourInferior to a CCK? No, this is not a fact, this is your opinion. I'd like to argument against the rest as well, but like Ambitions I also don't see why you need to be so hostile.
You're not the sole pinnacle of logic here. Other people have different playstyles and different opinions.
I am going to agree to disagree and leave it at that, hoping you'll chill the heck out.
I stopped reading there. I am not trying to offend you and you need to cool it. Whatever you're reading in my posts, it isn't there. End of story.Okay, first of all, I understand that you are trying to offend me currently in a really elaborate way. It's not working.