Wow, that looks great! Though I would cough out for a sheet of plain paper next time, if you don't mind me saying... haha!
I would say that with Jordan, that was a mite intentional. One lanky-
friend of mine, much like Jordan, has what I call 'chicken legs' - skinny legs which honestly look weird attached to his upper body! In fact, that's about the only way to tell him and Galbatore apart.
I appreciate your advice, don't get me wrong, but the thing is... it's like, I know there's anatomical issues with my work. They've been pointed out before often, and I've tried my darnedest to fix them. But I don't think it's a few body inaccuracies which are putting my work down in the ditch. Perhaps this is a stupid thing to say, but let's take Munch's 'The Scream' as an example. Obviously, that isn't anatomically correct! But the style and personality is present in droves, which is all that's needed.
I'm glad you posted Conquest, as it's a great showcase of what I mean. It's not as detailed as something by me. But look at the man, and even with no knowledge of Lone Tree, you know a good deal about him already. He's shady, untrustworthy, demented. Perhaps even a mite demonic. And certainly, 100% someone you wouldn't want to mess with! Just looking at Conquest there, you'd probably think that he'd stick a knife in your back for 10 pence - and that he'd probably enjoy it, and likely get away with it! Meanwhile, my drawings are just a bit ambiguous.