I feel like tree or boulder works kind of like that, otherwise if you really feel neutral about something you can just not react it.
Benny, aka @Clare the possesed, please stop posting if all you're going to be doing is replying with the same emoji - it's not adding anything to the discussion. Thanks.
the look you give the invisible camera when your friend says something exceptionally stupid
The text you right when you see an emoji that resembles the face you make at the invisible camera when your friend says something incredibly stupidthe look you give the invisible camera when your friend says something exceptionally stupid
That’s basically the same thing as not reacting imo. It wouldn’t convey much and would be used less than the other newer reactions.
Okay, I see what you mean. I think there should be a neutral reaction, even though most of the time it would probably be used sarcasticallyIt's almost like we should have a dedicated neutral face reaction so the same thing doesn't happen again.
I feel like tree or boulder works kind of like that, otherwise if you really feel neutral about something you can just not react it.
I don't think I've seen anyone use as a truly neutral/indifferent/apathetic reactionThat’s basically the same thing as not reacting imo. It wouldn’t convey much and would be used less than the other newer reactions.
And if you want an “Unamused”/“Really?” emote I made one.
I feel like the Tombstone reaction fills the same role, but I see where you're coming.I don't think I've seen anyone use as a truly neutral/indifferent/apathetic reaction
My intention is for it to be more of a soulless stare because of what I just read
The most similar examples that convey the same emotion that I intended for are or that one image of Saul Goodman or saying "bro" out loud