Snickerbobble
The Painter
If it's not all self-explanatory, then you should explain what isn't self-explanatory. Crystal Elemental? Nymph Hunter? No idea what they look like or behave like. Sprites are not needed (though they do help), however descriptions should be the bare minimum, but you don't even have that.Because most of it should be fairly self-explanatory.
I'll use one of my small ideas as an example: pogo sticks. How you've presented your biome is as if I made a topic simply saying "There should be pogo sticks," and nothing more. I can expect most to know what they look like, but how does one get one? How does it work? Surely I can spend a few more seconds of time explaining this item? Same with you.
If you "don't have the time" to go into detail for your biome, why even post it? It's an incomplete idea and you seem completely against improving it and bringing it to a presentable state. The time you've spent writing back to us could have been instead spent on improving your biome. You've probably spent more time arguing against constructive criticism than you would have spent typing up a few more sentences for your suggestion.
Yes, I do, as I have no idea how you intend for them to behave like. Or look like. Morning Wood and Everscream are two examples that behave similarly but look much different. Does yours behave like them? I've got no idea what your treant looks like. No one does, but you. Not everyone knows about treants, so with no mention of them being tree beasts, then those who don't know have no idea if you're just making up your own creature. I mean, you've got no descriptions for anything else, so "Treant" is nothing but a weird word to them. You're here trying to explain your idea to us, it's not our job to do a google search to see what you mean, you should be providing the info yourself. You don't need to type up paragraphs, just a line- just ANYTHING more than just a name. But you've got nothing, so all you have is a name suggestion, nothing more.Do you really need to have a Treant described to you? Have you never read, watched, or played ANYTHING in the fantasy genre before?
Slimes are simple enough to get, but your other creatures could use descriptions. You could also just say it acts like any normal slime, as some slimes have different behaviors, like slimelings, mother and corrupt slimes, and the spiked slimes, for example.Do you really need someone to explain to you how another slime recolor would look and behave?
No, you don't need to treat us like 3 year olds, but you also shouldn't treat us like we're mind readers.I don't think a suggestion should have to treat it's readers as if they were 3 years old.
It doesn't seem like it.. with how negative you've been responding to constructive criticism. We're not here trying to insult you, we're here trying to help improve the idea, but instead, when constructive criticism is given, you continue to argue against it. You seem to be mistaking constructive criticism with insults, and instead of being open for ideas, you continue to argue how we're wrong and try to belittle us with passive aggressive remarks like "I shouldn't have to treat you like you're 3 years old," and "Making sprites is only a waste of time" when you know others on here who have sprited for their threads. That's just insulting.AND it's appreciated.
I was interested to see what could become of this, but if you've got no plans to improve and with your disrespectful attitude, I'm no longer interested.
Last edited: