Nicol Bolas
Terrarian
If it's that simple then why are you upset
I'm not sure I understand your point. Consider an analogy.
Let's say that one day, someone installs a device on your front door that slaps you in the face every time you enter your house. Now, it doesn't slap you hard; it's not breaking bones, teeth, or skin. And you can stop it easily enough by just raising your hand to block the slap, since it's easy enough to anticipate it; it only happens when you open the door. You can get used to it, and you can make it not hurt.
I hope we can all agree that this doesn't make the face slapping device OK. The fact that a problem can be mitigated relatively easily does not mean there isn't a problem.
It doesn't matter if it requires 5 minutes or "300000 hours"; I'm arguing that I shouldn't have to mitigate it at all.
While I think his "pushing an agenda" part is a bit disingenuous, I'd have to agree that there's clearly two sides of this coin here and it's to a point where debating is pointless as the people who have their current opinions aren't going to change them. I'm glad to at least have gotten out my concerns.
My response wasn't really about whether the debate is pointless or not; it's more about the characterization of how people are debating. Namely, the "both sides are arguing badly" bit.
I for one have never misrepresented the opposing position in a way like this: "oh no i have to stop cramming my npcs in tight rooms compact together in one biome in a bad arrangement in order to receive normal prices over slightly increased prices, how ever shall i cope with this without spending 300000 hours on building beautiful houses across the world"
At all times, I have tried to be respectful of the opinions of others while clearly differing with them. I have tried to answer the criticisms of my arguments when they are made.
So I feel it is very unfair to lump my arguments in with people who just flat-out ignore, or worse misrepresent, what is being said on the other side.