Game Mechanics Cloud Armor Set Bonus

Status
Not open for further replies.

Aceplante

Official Terrarian
I was recently viewing a suggestion for Cloud Armor, and had a few cool ideas for how it could function:

As a set bonus:
-Can give the wearer up to two extra jumps with the cloud in a bottle particle effect

-gives the wearer two weak dashes with no invincibility frames

As an added layer of immersion, when raining, turns gray like rain clouds

-During thunderstorms, crackles with electricity and occasionally zaps nearby enemies
 
Dude, really? You made your own thread to comment on someone else's idea?
 
Dude, really? You made your own thread to comment on someone else's idea?
I had my own take on what the set bonus should be, which is allowed.

And i even linked the original post.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? You had to make your own thread to provide an idea for an idea? You could have just posted it in the thread.
 
I had my own take on what the set bonus should be, which is allowed.
Have you ever heard of the phrase, "Just because it is legal, does not mean it is right"?

I've seen you do this a handful of times now, and honestly m, I frown upon it too. Instead of making a better version of the suggestion, you should be helping the suggestion become a better version of itself.

Based on principle, I do not support this suggestion.
 
I had my own take on what the set bonus should be, which is allowed.

And i even linked the original post.
Just post the ideas, on the original post.
 
things heating up in the terraria game suggestion forum
 
he means you all jumped on me for posting this separately
I wouldn't call it jumping on you, that generally implies the person being jumped has done nothing wrong.
What you did was not against the rules. However, all you did was bite off of someone else's suggestion. This isn't even a suggestion on its own, as it isn’t even a unique take on his overall idea, it's just an add on. And as such deserves to be a suggestion for the original thread. Now that's just my opinion of course, which is irrelevant, but I would suggest against things like this in the future.
 
Last edited:
Looks like Aceplante went ahead and added these extra thoughts into the original thread, so this thread will be closed as it’s not needed.

So much of the back and forth drama could have been avoided here if the thread was reported and not commented on. Just something to keep in mind going forward. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom