What has been your favorite piece of media that you have consumed?
The scope of this question is decidely broad. To help demonstrate why I find this type of question difficult to answer, I shall attempt an explanation. Please pardon me if it begins to become a tad lengthy, I shall attempt to keep it brief.
"Media" refers to a variety of "mediums," which, in turn, are methods of transferring information.
Books are a medium, as is television, radio, oral explanation, games of any type or variety, food, acting, and
anything else that is able to hold a meaning another may understand.
Not all media is able to perform the same functions, or transfer the same types of information.
A cross-reference with "tools" is useful for our purposes.
If I was to ask you for your "favorite tool," what would you reply?
Let us, for the sake of the argument, hypothetically choose a "hammer" for you.
This is all well and good, but would you still choose a hammer as your "favorite tool" for transportation?
You see, "tool" is a generic umbrella term for any external object that enhances your capabilities in some way. An automobile is no less a tool than a sledgehammer, the difference is
to what end it is utilized.
We, humans, as creatures of convenience, choose our "favourites" on what most effectively satisfies the conditions required.
For moving a table of average size you may choose a "pick-up" truck, but you would eschew it in favor of a "moving" van potentially depending on the weather.
Similarly, if you found it necessary to travel to Europe on short notice, you would likely choose an aeroplane as a form of transportation instead of an ocean liner. If you were going to Europe on vacation without a time constraint you may choose the ocean liner instead of the aeroplane due to the experience being more conducive to a vacation.
We choose our "favourites" based on the efficiency the particular tool or method affords us in satisfying our unique requirements that must be met at a minimum.
It is for this reason that construction workers do not ride hammers to work and then demolish buildings with automobiles.
Conditions can also be quite unobtrusive at times. If you were to ask me what language I preferred speaking, my answer would be inconclusive.
If you asked instead what language I preferred speaking
in the United States of America, my answer would be "English." Most everyone here understands it to at least a certain degree, but most do -not- understand either Japanese or Latin, making both of the other languages rather ineffective at their intended function: "Communication."
Each medium has pros to recommend it, and cons to give pause about its use.
The more senses it includes, the more powerful the experience, but its convenience, ease of use, and attention required are all affected proportionally in a negative way.
Even within one medium, books, for example, there are subdivisions. "Genres," some of these subdivisions are considered. Other subdivisions are "practical," "theoretical," "poetry" and so forth.
Each of these subdivisions exists for a reason: namely, they transmit information differently than any other subdivision in the medium, having individual pros and cons.
This is reminiscent of screwdrivers. All are used to construct parts into a greater whole, yes, but I would very much like to see an argument for contractors to use micro precision screwdrivers when installing sub-flooring into a house. It would likely be worth some humor if nothing else.
All of this is to say, different types of mediums are essentially different tools, and are not "one size fits all." For if I was to answer your question with: "The discourses of Epictetus," you would have gained nary any usable information.
Did I read it for pleasure or for profit?
Do I agree with any of the information contained within it, or is it my favourite object of ridicule?
Why did I seek to read it to begin with, and was that desire satiated by its being read?
It is this information, the subtext of my generic answer: "The discourses of Epictetus," that will allow you to understand me as a person. What I value, what I do not. How I would decide questions in a given circumstance.
Likewise, this is how characterization takes place in novels. The reader, through the masterful direction of the author or storyteller, comes to understand the characters through the decisions they have made. The reasons for them, and how they approached the consequences of their decisions.
I shall leave off here, as I could continue almost indefinitely. I thus end by stating this inability to answer a simple question without "giving a lecture" is but one reason I have not any friends.
Cheers,
-Adalicia