People should learn about the reason why "Claim and Evidence" has the word AND in it.
SERIOUSLY.
I can't
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing understand crap if you put evidence in front of me and expect me to know the
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing claim.
Imagine this, we are in a police station and we are working there for investigation stuff, and a colleague comes up and puts a napkin on my table in an evidence bag. WTF am I supposed to do with that? WTF does it relate to? The colleague just stares at me as if I'm supposed to
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing know. But I
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing don't. They provide me with evidence, but they don't provide the claim. They don't say
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
about the napkin and how it's soaked in formawhatever and is used in a crime of whatever, no they just give me evidence, and don't
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing give claim.
Then they blame you for not
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing getting it! It's so
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing enraging, they are not giving the
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing information I need, and yet they blame me for the fact that they didn't give enough
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing information! CLAIM AND EVIDENCE, there's a reason why there's an '"and" in that. Make a
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing thesis statement or something, don't just drop evidence on me and look at me like a
![Redigit :red: :red:](/assets/emoticons/red/red.png)
ing dog and expect me to get what you're trying to say!