HandsomeSquirrel🐿️
Steampunker
I'm sorry, but there is basically no objective evidence I can find against it. If you have some, please link it to me or something.
The Scientific Case Against Evolution

Darwin’s Top 10 Arguments Against His Own Theory | Evolution News
In its youth the flat-fish is symmetrical with one eye on each side. However, as the body matures, one eye “begins to glide slowly round the head.”

The first amendment does not say that. There is nothing in the first amendment, or even the whole Constitution that would make teaching this illegal. Actually, banning teaching macroevolution in school likely would violate the first amendment.
These are both valid points.First of all, macroevolution is not an "atheist perspective", a large number of scientists, including the ones who helped develop and support the theory, are not atheists. Second of all, schools are supposed to only teach objective things, they can't teach things that are personal and subjective to many different people, that's not the point of school. Macroevolution is based on objective evidence, which is why it's appropriate to teach in a school.
I think the biggest issue, with both creationists and evolutionists, is the closed-mindedness to consider the other's perspective. It has often been ruled that schools shouldn't teach anything religious, because religion is deemed to be subjective and personal. I'll quote John Frame here, from A History of Western Philosophy and Theology: "When people oppose the teaching of 'religious' concepts, they are not presenting a criterion that can logically distinguish between true and false ideas. Rather, they are using the term religion as a club to arbitrarily exclude consideration of viewpoints that they don't happen to like." Such as creationism. And on the flipside, creationists sometimes shut off from hearing evolutionist claims and evidence, which is close-minded as well. To make an educated decision on what viewpoint to have, one should hear and try to understand the testimony from both sides before coming to a determined conclusion.
While macroevolution can be presented in schools, I don't think it should be lauded as irrevocable fact. Science is the way we try to understand the world around us, and we're constantly discovering new things and realizing the folly of old ideas. Scientists shouldn't immediately disregard what they find when it doesn't match up with what they want to find. From what I've seen and been taught, there's lots of evidence for the creationist perspective, and it shouldn't be ignored.